And Yet Still More Random Thoughts

Adrienne

adymail.jpg

Adrienne has always written me such interesting emails, and we tend to get in so many fascinating debates, that I thought I would start a page just for her and the discussions we have. I thought this picture of her at a mailbox was appropriate.

I start with this email here psychoanalyzing her. Note that I do this for recreational purposes only, and I'm not a licensed therapist. As always, if you're experiencing problems, please, consult a physician

Hey,

So, I was thinking about friends, and the way people make friends and the situations that friends hang out. I find myself to hang out with people differently than most people do...for example, most people have a few friends in a group, and that group always hangs out. They do a particular activity or hang out in a particular place, where all new friends sort of branch off of the old group...that way, one persons social situation grows from one source...but for me, its totally not like that. I tend to find friends in the weirdest places, and i don’t think that I have ever had a 'group' of friends that I would, ya know, call 'the gang' or anything.

This also makes having birthday parties sort of awkward. Last birthday, I had a friend from a musical i was in, one from the Opera program, a high school friend, my best friend from school, and a few other select people...it was weird.

Adrienne

 

Well, Adrienne, I don’t know how big a problem this really is, but I took this to a friend of mine who is a family therapist (without giving him your name or anything, naturally). I told him what your email said, and also a little about you, like, your personality and your age and all that: I don’t know any of your other friends, but just knowing what I know about you it seems like you could just tell a guy to paint himself blue and stand on the corner in his underwear, and he’d do it. Not that you ever would, but you could.

These guys really seem to like you
blueman.jpg

Well, this could be good news or bad news, I suppose, but my friend has been a therapist for many years and seen over a thousand patients, and he says he has never heard of this. His best guess was that you “compartmentalize” like you have all these different friends and have to keep them all separate for whatever reason. I don’t think this is so, mostly because this is something you always hear about psychotics doing, like how Hitler was nice to his dog but then killed millions of people, and never saw the two things as being related to each other.

 

I think it’s just because you’re smarter than most people and if you meet, say, 100 people, maybe two or three of them would be able to relate to you, and what are the odds that those two or three people would know each other? Plus, you live in Canada, and there are less people up there.

 

Maybe not…..

March 14, 2006

Well, I dont know if I am smarter than most people I meet, but I guess that makes sense. I think the other thing though that throws me off of this idea of not liking cliques is that if I am ever in a big group of people that I am friends with, I always have this weird urge to eat noodles. It doesnt even really matter what kind of noodles either...ravioli, tortellini or even just plain old spaghetti. It's like I relate lots of people to food that is high in carbs. But not individuals, just when we are all in a big group. What's up with that do you think?

Adrienne

Compulsive behavior, just by itself, is not unusual, but when it's triggered by something like a social phobia, it requires a closer look. I would guess that it was a repressed desire to make yourself unattractive to large crowds of people, but in this case that's clearly not true.
 
Either that, or you're just really really bad at making yourself unattractive. Which would make you a failure. And not just a failure, but such an abject failure that you certainly would be suicidal. Which, again, you're clearly not.
 
Or it could be an eating disorder. I'm not sure, I'll have to do more research.
 
As for not being smarter than most people, you have to consider how stupid the average person is. Just statistically, if the average I.Q. is 100 (like they always told us in school), then half the population has an I.Q. under 100.
 
Anyway, let me know what you think....

March 23, 2006
 
If the average I.Q. is 100, it could be that most people are above 100, and then just a few retarded people are far below it. It doesn't mean that half the people are below it.
 
Plus, today I was wondering why the song by the Proclaimers says "I would walk 500 miles" when the Proclaimers are from Scotland, and they use metrics in Scotland, shouldn't the song go like this, "I would walk 807 kilometres, and I would walk 807 more, just to be the man who walked 1614 kilometres to fall down at your doo-ooo-ooor"....?
 
Adrienne
 
That's a good point about the song, Adrienne. I admit that had never occurred to me.
 
Regarding the average I.Q., it could be that most people are above 100 and just a few are way way down there, but just based on my experience dealing with people, it's the exact opposite. When I guessed that half the people were below 100, I was being generous; I think there are way way way more retarded people than there are super-geniuses.